Common Quiz Night Complications Part 2
You may recall we’re going to write a series of short posts about ideas people sometimes come up with for their quizzes which, though well-intentioned, are generally complicated, hard to enforce and detrimental – and thus we usually (quite strongly) recommend against them.
Last week it was overaggressive theming at a quiz. This week, quite briefly, it’s…
Penalty Points and Bonus Points
I’m going to mention penalty points for teams cheating and (as was suggested to me last week and comes up quite often) extra points for teams with fewer members.
I’m pretty much against all bonus points. By bonus points I mean anything which doesn’t relate to how good you are at the quiz – so things like best team name, best costume, how quickly you get your sheet in. I’d pretty firmly stand against any suggestions that these should affect the result of the quiz. If I’ve ever had to give in to any of those, I’ve made sure it’s a very small number of points. And giving people a separate prize if you want to reward them for any of these things is a much better idea.
OK, it’s not the Olympics, and the main aim is fun, but a quiz should have some integrity, otherwise someone’s going to leave feeling sour. So no extra points for being able to sing the theme tune from ‘Cheers’, ok?
And likewise with penalty points. Even more than integrity in this case, it’s about atmosphere. Penalty points = Bad vibes. A quiz master is able to hold the authority of a room in as much as he is helping people to enjoy themselves and they will enjoy themselves most if they listen to him/her and follow any instructions from him/her. He has no actual authority in the lives of the people he is running the quiz for. If they turn against him, he has nowhere else to go really. Particularly with corporate quizzes. We’ve been brought in to do a job and the job is get people to have a good time. Penalty points will always be disputed, and what happens then? An arbitration panel? An appeal court?
Finally, something which can be a potential source of bonus points and penalty points: adjustment of scores according to team size. This is suggested surprisingly often, but, like many things, is not quite as simple as it might at first seem.
Firstly, if there is a team which is smaller than others, that is (usually) their own issue or choice, they could have had more team members.
Secondly, if they win, then they might get £100, or 6 massive boxes of chocolates between 5 people, and not between 8 people. Well That’s nice for them. And if they do badly, well they can (and will) use it as an excuse. And if they beat a rival team then they can (and usually will) amplify their gloating rights.
And, primarily, how on earth are you meant to work it out? Is one person half as good as two? Is a team of 3 half as good as a team of 6? Of course not. Most people’s knowledge overlaps, so it may only be pretty small margins where there is a benefit to a larger team. Indeed, sometimes, in certain quizzes, too many cooks can spoil the broth.
We try very hard before our quizzes to make sure team numbers are evenly spread. We don’t like teams above 7 but if every team has 10 (for example for a dinner quiz) so be it. If most teams have 6ish and there is a team of 10, we’ll get them to split up. All that is much better than penalty points.
All in all, we’re not fans of penalty points or bonus points. Keep it clean, keep it fair!
I have on occasion awarded bonus points in increments of tenths or hundredths of a point, so as to indicate their pointlessness (sic). These would be given, for example, for being able to answer follow-up questions as I was giving the answers, for giving especially amusing wrong answers, or even for protesting in an amusing way. Likewise, all such accumulated bonus fraction-points could be wiped out if someone manages to annoy the room (for example, with a particularly unfunny heckle that gets jeered), and could even be bet against me in support of an outlandish claim of an alternative answer. These accumulated fractions of points would usually make no difference except in the event of a tie, and I would usually keep half an eye on matters to make sure that, if teams were at any risk of ending up on level scores in the lead, they would somehow magically have the same fraction of bonus points as well. Not suitable for all audiences, of course, but quite fun for a crowd with whom one is fairly familiar.
I quite like this – I can see it working for some regular crowds, particularly a weekly pub quiz crew.